Fourth ‘Doctor’ season brings new alien agendas — part 1
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 01. 2008 and is filed under Posts by E. Stephen Burnett,Learning from the Secular.
More hideously scary monsters are
coming to the new season 4 of the smashing British sci-fi series Doctor Who. Like the Cybermen, a race of
metallic soulless humanoids who want to “upgrade” all humans to be like them,
this threat arises from a surprising source and threatens the existence of
planet Earth, by compelling people to be subject to certain extraterrestrial
modes of thought.
And it’s courtesy of none other
than Doctor Who’s very executive
producer and head writer, Russell T. Davies.
“Wait wait wait wait!”
While I say that, please imagine
me holding up my hands in a faux-panicked manner, reminiscent of the Tenth
Doctor, right before I whip out a clever solution to avoid being killed. This is
because, unlike some Christian writers and culture pundits, I seem to find
myself unafraid of Davies’ own ideological invasions.
‘Upgrading is compulsory’
Davies, who re-launched the new
TARDIS and its time-traveling, world-saving Time Lord occupant(s) in 2005, is
“the most influential gay man in Britain,” according to an
April 6 London Independent article.
Well, I kind of already knew that. But furthermore — well, especially if you
have Christian friends who enjoy sending you dozens of email forwards, you’ve
surely heard of British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins? He’s the same
guy who looks stupid in Ben Stein’s anti-evolutionary-dogma documentary Expelled. Well, it seems Dawkins is
having a cameo in the new Doctor’s season 4.
“People were falling at his feet,” says Davies, creator of
the BBC’s flagship show. “[. . . I]t
was Dawkins people were worshipping.”
As writer and executive producer of Doctor Who, Davies
often plays with religious imagery (from a cross-shaped space station to robot
angels with halos), but he’s a fervent believer in Dawkins. “He has brought
atheism proudly out of the closet!”
Later, Davies unabashedly unveils
the purpose behind Captain Jack Harkness — an openly “bisexual” character who pretty
much hits on everybody, guy, girl or extra-Earth species. The idea is not only to
help people tolerate homosexual beliefs, but to encourage children to “come out
of the closet” themselves. “If there is one kid now doing that, then in 10
years’ time there will be thousands of kids, and 10 years after that, every kid
who wants to will be doing that,” Davies said. “Isn’t that brilliant?”
Intriguing! Somehow the image of
the Cybermen enters my mind. “[We are] the
next level of mankind. We are Human Point Two. Every citizen will receive a
free upgrade. You will become like us. . . . Upgrading is compulsory.”
Meanwhile, as for lingering cultural opposition to becoming one with Cybermen? “De-lete. De-lete. De-lete.”
The heart of the TARDIS
One might be a bit unsure why I’m
not bothered about this stuff. Is
there something wrong with me? Am I a compromising Christian? perhaps one of
those quasi-backsliders who’s just being deceived by awesome characters, spectacular
special effects and epic good-versus-evil storytelling?
It’s that last element, actually,
that seems the best reason. Because while Davies and other writers are putting
in evolutionary and even gay-rights junk, they’re also putting in really “fantastic!” messages of redemption, either
intentionally or incidentally.
Though the program has its “moments”
— innuendo here, a double entendre
there — and is based solidly in an evolutionary,
everything-supernatural-is-just-advanced-science view, the heart of the TARDIS
pulses with remnant energy of a very Judeo-Christian worldview, similar to the warp core
of the starship
But then, goes a legitimate
argument, can’t other religions find hints of their views in Doctor Who? And doesn’t it directly
oppose Christianity with ideas such as that of The Satan Pit, which is that there’s just one demonic creature in
deep space, sending out thought waves that make all kinds of religions believe
there really are more-powerful devils
and monsters?
Well, perhaps. And it’s true that
general-issue moral messages do not make a story Christian. But if we dismiss
the Doctor as void of Christian
virtue, then we might as well also throw out a lot of “Christian”-labeled books
and movies that also imply humans are
decent and God-fearing on their own, without much input from Him. Anything that
doesn’t directly reference the message of Redemption — that Christ, the
Creator/Savior, died to save sinners who deserve and merit nothing from Him on their own — is not truly Christian.
And it’s that message of
redemption that makes Doctor Who
imbued with Christian influence — a topic I’ll be exploring further in the
second installment of this short serial.
(In closing, though, hello again to the Spec-Faith contributing “staff”
and its readers. Yes, I have been absent for a time, traveling the universe,
but I’ve just recently returned to this planet and I hope I can stay for a
while. Thanks for your patience, and I hope to be around more in the coming
months!)
Comments
| Page: 1 of 1 |
-
Thursday, May 01. 2008
Kameron wrote:
You said it yourself in the last sentence of the second-to-last paragraph: "Anything that doesn’t directly reference the message of Redemption — that Christ, the Creator/Savior, died to save sinners who deserve and merit nothing from Him on their own — is not truly Christian."
"Redemption" is a basic theme that can originate from many sources that have nothing to do with Christianity. I'd say the numerous other, secular themes contained within the show outweigh any benefit the theme of redemption, separate and apart from any direct tie to Christ, brings.
That said, I've enjoyed past episodes of the current series, though I haven't watched since season 1. However, I have no problem discontinuing my viewership when a show starts spewing overt, anti-Christian propaganda.
Reply to this -
Thursday, May 01. 2008
E. Stephen Burnett wrote:
Excellent point, Kameron, and that's why I have a second column part in the works. A message of redemption itself does not always specifically reflect Christianity in an orthodox, Biblical way.
However, if we decide that only specific portrayals of redemption are acceptable for Christians' cultural consumption, then only the Biblical "true myth" of real Redemption will do for us. Any fictitious parallel simply won't match up thought-for-thought, in one way or another.
For example, even Aslan dying for Edmund in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, often upheld as the epitome of salvation allegory in fantasy fiction, is "suspect": with the White Witch acting as "the Emperor's hangman," it bears too much similarity to the "ransom theory" theological belief, in that God had to "pay" Satan for human souls with the death of His Son, rather than satisfy His own wrath.
I would contend, though, that because the True Myth of real Redemption is woven into the fabric of the universe by its Creator, so that theme can be seen in various other stories that center around conflicts between ultimate good and evil. Despite some of its producers' intentions, Doctor Who often reflects these truths, as I hope to show in next week's concluding column.
Reply to this
| Page: 1 of 1 |


