Strange story spectrum — from barn-raisers to bloodsuckers

Print the article

This entry was posted on Friday, July 17. 2009 and is filed under Posts by E. Stephen Burnett,Culture,Evil Monologues.

Christian fiction is weird. If we didn’t already know that, it’s now reinforced by a Chicago Tribune story revealing how evangelical publishers are hitting all the hot buttons in the book world. And the genres are wholly divergent: creepy vampires, and quiet Amish communities.

This is interesting indeed. But I submit there’s a connection between the two. And I couldn’t have thought of it without the aid of my wife and an amazing discussion we had over greasy fish at Long John Silver’s, just last night, on the way to Bible study. (Yes, I’m now married, and that partly contributed to my absence from Spec-Faith contributions. …)

Of course, Twilight is to blame for the vampire craze, and the only reason I’m not fully annoyed at Christians copying the culture yet again is because John Olson, a terrific guy, good author, and supreme ACFW writer’s workshop host, finally got his vampire novel (Shade) published. But he’s the exception to the vampire craze; I happen to know he’d written the novel years ago and of course couldn’t find a publisher who’d take it on. Then came Twilight and hordes of swooning fangurlz, and — I’m employing some conjecture here — suddenly everybody who had shopped a Christian vampire story concept started getting callbacks.

Author and Spec-Faith contributor Jill Williamson already said everything I’d have wanted to say about Twilight, and even better because a) she’s female, b) she’s actually read the book. (In short: it’s questionable-at-best porn for women, and that’s my extreme phrasing, not Jill’s; however, I believe I can defend it.) She also reviewed Shade and another Christian vampire novel, Field of Blood. (Both sound cool enough. Perhaps I’ll soon read one or both. First I need to finish Williamson’s non-vampire novel, By Darkness Hid — marriage interrupted my reading!)

Yes, I believe in capitalism, and I understand enough about the book business to know that trends can’t just be dismissed with high-sounding rationale if you want to make profits (and nothing is wrong with that). Still I wish Christians wouldn’t just roll out a torrent of vampire stories just because the secular trends decree that now it’s cool. It looks bad, and it won’t last.

Instead — here it comes — publishers risk chasing after this trend and sucking it dry until finally it’s dead and with no possibility of coming back to life for several centuries.

 

Amish vs. Vampires

But weighing in, in this corner, is what the Tribune says is “the undisputed industry leader” in Christian fiction:

[T]ypically, romances and family sagas set in contemporary Amish communities. They're a surprise hit with evangelical women attracted by a simpler time, curiosity about cloistered communities and admiration for the strong, traditional faith of the Amish.

The vampires don’t stand a chance. But I’m not sure what’s so surprising about these kinds of stories attracting evangelical women. (I may get in trouble here.) From what I’ve seen of evangelicaldom, these are the very virtues prized even among women who don’t care for Amish stories. What is surprising about that, I wonder? Perhaps the Tribune writer assumes that a more-epic faith — involving a Bible filled with battles, lineages, miracles, special effects, and above all an omnipotent, don’t-mess-with-Him God who loves and yet is holy and wrathful — would naturally lead to more-epic stories, with similar elements, not just Safety-First stories?

I don’t want to knock all the Amish fiction. But the fact that they appeal so much to evangelical women scares me more than vampires. An overemphasis on this is not healthful to Christians.

This is what I mean:

-          The stories are steeped in environments, even “mythology,” that are Traditional. That’s a comforting thought. This has been around for a while. Even the stories with newer elements contain familiar elements. You don’t have to fight much to accept it.

 

-          In such stories, the environment is highly structured. You can let yourself go, even let the men handle things. If you were a woman in this story, you need only go with the flow, maybe only worry about raising your children. Yes, there may be problems, but (dare I say it) even those are “safe” in a way, because they are predictable.

 

-          Such stories often contain “bad boys,” either religious or otherwise. Bad boys, to many women, are attractive. They have a strength that real-life “nice guys” often don’t have. They may be bad, but at least they’re powerful. There’s a strange comfort in that — a “comfort” that, unfortunately, leads to so many twisted relationships and enabling of evil abuses by men against women. It’s something I did. At least he’s strong. Maybe he’ll change. There’s a control in being controlled.

Well, isn’t that interesting. All three of those sets of characteristics apply equally to the appeal of legalistic environments and the hunting habits of vampires.

(Now I may really get in trouble.) When it comes to the Amish, I have a different view than many Christians do. Yes, these are just stories about the Amish, and perhaps some of them deal more even-handedly with the good and bad aspects of the lifestyle they practice.

But I know of many people who take the desire for safety, “simple life” and “traditional faith” way too far. They don’t just read stories about the Amish and pine away (which I maintain is itself questionable, when compared with reality and Christ’s commands for His church to engage the unbelieving world for His sake). Instead they want to be almost-Amish. They dress like them. They have the same cloistered views. Some want to live like them. All of the “safety,” and often even less accountability in a Christian community. They want their men to be large and in charge, a dangerous desire for control in being controlled as I said above. In essence, they earnestly desire the conditions that will lead not only to spiritual abuse (sometimes even physical abuse), but to a form of idolatry that puts people, tradition, safety and cloistered living above desires to glorify God and make Him, His Word and His grace the center of our lives.

Still, we have to contend with one little ‘graph in the story:

Christian fiction often has mimicked successful genres: Romance. Sci-fi. Legal Thrillers. But in Amish fiction, Christian publishing has something it can genuinely claim as its own.

Yes, Amish fiction seems at least original. But similar to a Washington Post story that rankled me exactly two years ago, the Tribune leaves out one genre: fantasy. We had it first. J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis were not copying modern trends, they made modern trends. And both did it (albeit in slightly different ways) while glorifying God and echoing His truths.

If more Christian fiction continued to follow in fantasy’s path — and moreover, more Christians grew into epic-level faith that didn’t overvalue safety and “tradition,” but an epic God and His glory — we could legitimately claim that genre as our own. Question: how can we help this?

 

The winner: Bloodsucking barn-raisers

That was the serious stuff, and I’m interested in reading ideas, reactions, critiques, requests for Biblical back-up, whatever. Because of my background and familiarity with almost-Amish types of people (especially in homeschooling circles and on the blogosphere), you may simply not have seen what I’ve seen.

But now I’ll close with some frivolity. As a Christian, convinced capitalist, and aspiring author, I’m sure there’s a way to cash in on the strange saturation in Christian fiction of both Amish and vampires. The answer? Amish vampires.

That could be the title. It cuts to the chase pretty well: Amish Vampires. No vagueness would be necessary. And to underscore the subtle theme, the cover illustration could be one of those little black Amish bonnets, lying in a field, and the little strings that tie the bonnet to the neck would be stained with bright red blood.

And the back-cover summary:

“Run! Zechariah, run!”

 

They are in your neighborhood. They are in your cornfields. They may even have taken over your buggy. Lights keep mysteriously coming on — and you are not even supposed to have lights.

 

Don’t go near the barn. They are feeding beyond your cows and now crave even human flesh, the lifeblood of the simple. Long thought a legend, a terrible threat has now awaken as The Blood-Suckers of Lancaster County live again. Now the residents of this quiet community cannot even go outside their homes to make phone calls. They will find you. They will take you. Beware!

I think I have a hit on my hands. Don’t any of you dare steal it. But wait. Perhaps what is even more horrible and unthinkable than anything I have written above — I just know someone will.

 
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    Page: 1 of 1
    • Friday, July 17. 2009 Cathi Hassan wrote:
      Sounds like a winning combination on your book idea! Something a little irksome is that this trend of vampires in fiction is that the Christian authors may appear to be copying the trend when they aren't all doing that. You mentioned that Shade was written some time ago, but the publishers weren't interested before. And then there's Sue Dent's Never Ceese--she had vampires and werewolves mixed in with some definite Christian values quite some time before the popularity of Twilight. I've never really understood the whole interest in bloodsuckers myself, but it surfaces over and over again (Dark Shadows, Anne Rice, Buffy).

      Yes on fantasy. Tolkien and Lewis stand as originals, not even much alike in their work, originals who set an impossibly high standard for anyone else to meet, Christian or not.
      Reply to this
    • Friday, July 17. 2009 Ken Rolph wrote:
      Much American culture slops out over its borders. But as near as I can tell, the Amish stuff isn't making any sort of dent in other places. At least not in Australia. Possibly a distinct lack of Amish!
      Reply to this
    • Friday, July 17. 2009 Eric Wilson wrote:
      Thanks for the great comments. I must say, though, as the author of "Field of Blood," that I started pitching this series to Christian publishers nearly five years ago. If you read my stuff, you'll see it copies nothing out there. What happened is that Christian publishers were afraid to touch it till the "Twilight" craze. This is the problem in this industry: not that Christian artists copycat, but that Christian companies are afraid to be the forerunners.

      Great comments. Keep 'em coming!
      Reply to this
    • Saturday, July 18. 2009 Rebecca LuElla Miller wrote:
      Eric, great observation.

      Still, I think Anne Rice may have brought vampires out of their coffins and Buffy popularized them. Then along came the rest.

      Stephen, you made some excellent points, chief among them the idea that Amish fiction is connected with idolatry.

      I see it just a little differently, however. In general women have a greater need for safety (as men have, in general, a greater need for significance). In the contemporary world, I think women have far less security than at any other time, because security is rooted in relationships.

      Hence, when women (who I assume are the readers of Amish fiction) look to and long for the kind of security they see in the pages of Amish fiction, they are misplacing their affection. God alone can give that sense of safety.

      And I suspect that a lot of this Amish fiction is poorly researched, if it has the elements the Tribune article listed ("admiration for the strong, traditional faith of the Amish"). When was the last time someone actually talked to an Amish person about Jesus Christ?

      My family background is an offshoot of the Amish, and I can tell you there is as much squabbling, backbiting, legalism ... well, sin, as you'll find any where. Their "faith" is their tradition, and it's not admirable.

      But who is saying that in Christian fiction? Maybe someone is. Since I don't read Amish stories, I don't really know.

      And good on you, Stephen, for recognizing the place of fantasy. Why it continues to be shuffled aside, I don't know.

      Becky
      Reply to this
      1. Monday, July 20. 2009 Fred Warren wrote:
        Ah, so in a sense, the Amish stories are themselves a kind of fantasy, though not in the form we're accustomed to seeing.

        I think, as others have noted, that these stories are attractive to people who value order and predictability above all else. They pick up a book with a bonnet on the cover, and they know exactly the world and storyline they're going to get. It's very comforting. Sci-Fi and Fantasy are polar opposites to that mindset because they are fundamentally speculative--they are not only unpredictable, they create very unfamiliar and often unsettling worlds and bring them into the realm of possibility. You'll never (well, hardly ever) entice an Amish fiction reader with spec-fic.
        Reply to this
    • Saturday, July 18. 2009 Mike Duran wrote:
      Stephen, I think the vampire mythos is far more rooted in literature and culture than you suggest. No doubt, it rises and falls (and morphs!) with the times, but the lore has been around for, literally, millennia. In other words, it's much more than a "trend" inflamed by Twilight before it dies another slow death.

      I recently posted on religious themes in Stoker's Dracula and happen to think that field is fertile for the Christian imagination. I mean, who says any fictional construct is not up for grabs, especially one so rife with biblical imagery? Maybe that's why I appreciate those Christian authors like Eric Wilson, John Olson, and Sue Dent who have at least wrestled with the concept. What worries me is not that Christian vampire stories might start appearing, but that Amish fiction might start driving the Christian market. Now that should scare the wits out of us!
      Reply to this
    • Monday, July 20. 2009 Jason wrote:
      Be scared Mike, be very scared. Whenever I pick up a CBD catalogue anymore, I am always dismayed. I flip to the 1 or 2 pages of fiction out of 50 pages of "too many books" (Ecc 12:12) and Christian kitsch, and it is almost fully dominated by Amish fiction. Gah. Of course, no men ever look in the catalogue. I know CBD sells all sorts of fiction, but I don't buy from them partly because the stuff I like isn't featured (unless Dekker has a book out).

      I'm still waiting for Chris Mikesell's Prairie romance gone horribly wrong...
      Reply to this
    • Monday, July 20. 2009 Amy Timco wrote:
      Great thoughts on the underlying similarities between these two trends, Stephen! I grew up in what we affectionately term "Amish Country," and I have a friend whose family used to be Amish. Unfortunately, from what she has told me, their faith is more in their traditions than in the Bible, and sometimes they practice things that are directly antithetical to Scripture. And they don't care! After getting saved, my friend's father tried to witness to the Amish elders of his church and while they weren't exactly "shunned," he was definitely shut down. They just didn't want to hear it.

      I've never read any of the Amish fare in the "inspirational" aisle, but I always wondered how the faith issues were handled.

      And having grown up alongside the Amish, I never understood what the fascination was. Though I will say that the Amish books were a big hit with the Amish themselves at the library where I worked. They were especially interested in the ones that had a character being shunned. I wonder what messages they were drawing from those stories.

      And yes, don't give Twilight too much credit for reviving the vampires. They've been around for a long time. Meyer just doctored them up for teens.
      Reply to this
    • Wednesday, July 29. 2009 Pam Halter wrote:
      Had to jump in here and mention Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. And I have to confess I bought it because the back cover was so intriguing. Haven't read it yet, though. Anyone else?
      Reply to this
    • Thursday, July 30. 2009 Amy Timco wrote:
      Oh no! Don't bring THAT up! I'm a hardcore Austen fan and I think it's just awful that they are ripping off her work to make a few bucks. Emboldened by their success, they're coming out with Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters next. It's just so inane!
      Reply to this
    • Wednesday, March 31. 2010 porn tube wrote:
      your article is so informative and interesting. nice shared.
      Reply to this

    Page: 1 of 1
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.